This section describes the design and construction of my waterblock. It is called the Kilowatt block since
that name suggests a powerful block, and a powerful block it is indeed.
Designing the block: requirements
As with every design, you have to gather a set of requirements before you can start
designing. The KiloWatt waterjacket is designed according to this set of requirements:
- Plain water as the coolant.
Water is cheap, has a very high intrinsic energy
(4.18kJ kg-1 K-1), a low viscosity, it is nontoxic, nonflammable
and it is not agressive.
- Optimized for a coolant flowrate of approximately 400 liters per hour.
Magnetic drive water pumps with a pumping rate of about 600-1200 liters
per hour are cheap, easy to obtain, small, silent and robust. When these pumps are
used in a closed circuit liquid cooling system, the total flow rate of the coolant
drops to 300-500 liters per hour due to flow resistance in the radiator, hoses and
waterjacket.
- Optimized for a power dissipation of at least 400 Watts into the waterjacket.
A TEC (Thermo-electric cooler, also known as a Peltier element) with enough heat pumping
capacity to be useful on today's CPU's will spit out 250-500 Watts of heat.
- Optimized for a power density of about 30 Watts per square centimeter.
The type of heat load that will be put onto the waterjacket makes quite a difference for
the design. The two types of heat load that are applicable are:
(1) A small heat producing surface with a high power density. The core of a processor like
the Intel Pentium III FC-PGA or AMD Athlon are examples of this type of heat load. Much
heat is produced over a small area. For the design, this means that a heat spreader is
required to distribute the heat over the waterjacket.
(2) A larger heat producting surface with a lower power density. The hot side of a TEC or
a capped processor like the Intel Pentium IV are examples of this type of load. Since the
heat is already distributed over a larger area, less heat spreading is required. This means
that the thinkness of the interface between the heat producing area and the coolant can be
reduced. This results in a lower thermal resistance between the heat producing area and
the coolant.
Since the KiloWatt waterjacket will be used together with a TEC, the waterjacket needs to
be optimized for a type 2 heat load.
- Large coolant <-> waterjacket contact area.
A large coolant <-> waterjacket contact area will help decrease the thermal resistance of the waterjacket
at the cost of a higher coolant flow resistance.
- High coolant speed in the waterjacket.
Water tends to stick onto a metal surface. This is not desirable since the thermal conductivity of water
is very low. A high coolant speed will decrease the thickness of the film sticking to the metal walls.
Finally this decreases thermal resistance. The cost of a high coolant speed is an increase of the coolant
flow resistance.
- Turbulent flow of the coolant.
A turbulent flow of the coolant is better in removing heat from metal surfaces than a non-turbulent flow.
Although almost every design provides enough turbulence, adding some extra doesn't harm. The cost of
a turbulent coolant flow is, again, an increase of the coolant flow resistance.
- Small size.
The waterjacket must fit on today's Socket-370 and Socket-A mainboards. This limits the size to
approximately 50x60mm. The maximal height is less critical, and depends on the case used.
- Easy to build with a minimum of required tools
The design of the waterjacket should not require specialist's tools or materials, so more people
are able to build the waterjacket.
Designing the block: construction tradeoffs
Choice of the construction material
Since at least the base plate (the part of the waterjacket that removes the heat from the heat source)
of the waterjacket needs to be thermally conductive, it makes sense to construct the
entire waterjacket from a thermally well conducting metal. In the tables below the
properties of some metals and alliages are shown.
Properties of some metals
| Metal name |
Thermal conductivity (W m-1 K-1) |
Density (kg m-3) |
Solderable |
| Pure aluminium | 237 | 2.70 | No |
| Pure copper | 390 | 8.96 | Yes |
| Pure silver | 429 | 10.5 | Yes |
| Pure gold | 318 | 19.3 | Yes |
| Pure iron | 80.4 | 7.87 | Yes |
Properties of some alliages
| Alliage name |
Thermal conductivity (W m-1 K-1) |
Density (kg m-3) |
Solderable |
| 'Construction' aluminium | ~150 | ~2.70 | No |
| E-Cu57 copper (99.9% Cu) | 350 | 8.96 | Yes |
| CuSil | ~500 | - | - |
| Yellow copper | 120 | 8.5 | Yes |
| Steel (99% Fe, 0.8% C) | 50 | 7.8 | Yes |
The best candidate metals for the waterjacket are aluminium, copper, silver and CuSil. While silver and CuSil
both provide a high thermal conductivity, they are also very expensive. Copper and aluminium are also quite
suitable, and a lot cheaper. Copper has the advantage of a higher thermal conductivity, while aluminium is
lighter and a bit cheaper than copper. But, it is almost impossible to get pieces of the pure metals; usually
what you get is an alliage which improves certain properties of the metal. And that is seldom thermal
conductivity. Look at the thermal conductivity values for common alliages like E-Cu57 and 'construction'
aluminium. A widely available copper alliage outperforms a widely available aluminium alliage three times! (please
note that this might not be true for all aluminium and copper alliages)
Copper wins the battle.
Construction method
When constructing a waterjacket, you can build it up from pieces of sheet metal, or start with a thick block of
metal, and cut out the desired shape. The sheet metal method is easier to work with and allows for more
complex shapes and experimentation. This is how the KiloWatt waterjacket will be constructed.
The design
The following design is able to fullfill all the requirements:
 Design of the KiloWatt waterjacket.
The baseplate of the waterjacket is a piece of 60mm long, 50mm wide, 5mm thick sheet copper. A 5mm thick
baseplate is a good compromise between strength, the weight, the extra thermal resistance of the baseplate and the heat
spreading. When 400W of heat is dumped into the waterjacket, a temperature difference of about 4 Kelvin between the two
sides of the baseplate is generated. A thinner baseplate would generate less temperature difference, but it would
also be weaker and unable to efficiently distribute the heat. A thicker baseplate would generate a too large
temperature difference between the two sides of the baseplate.
In the baseplate many 20mm long, 3mm thick copper pins are mounted. These provide turbulence and extra contact
area between the coolant and the metal. The thickness of the pins is an arbitrary choice. A square spiral of
1mm thick copper sheet narrows the channel to increase coolant speed.
The sides of the waterjacket are made of 3mm thick sheet copper. This prevents bending of the sides when the
waterjacket is clamped firmly onto the CPU. The top of the waterjacket is made out of a piece of sheet copper
and a piece of 12mm thick copper pipe.
The coolant enters the waterjacket through the upper pipe, so it directly cools the hotspot in the middle of the
jacket. From there the coolant travels down the spiral until it exits the waterjacket through the copper pipe
displayed left.
All the separate parts of the waterjacket, except the top, are soldered together with copper hardsolder or silversolder. Both
types of solder have a melting point of around 710 degrees Centigrade, and both are very good in conducting heat. They
also provide a very strong bond.
When everything is mounted, hardsoldered and cleaned the top can be soldered onto the waterjacket with standard
40/60 SnPb solder. This allows for easy removal of the top so the waterjacket can be inspected and cleaned after a few years of duty.
|